Maria Montessori’s Pedagogical Legacy (1870–1952): Linguistic and Cultural Contexts
Abstract
The article analyzes the impact of Maria Montessori’s (1870–1952) pedagogical legacy on the development of global education through the lens of intercultural and linguistic diversity. Special attention is paid to how the scientist’s ideas are interpreted and implemented in educational practice across various national contexts. The analysis explores how historical circumstances, ideological frameworks and educational traditions shape different images of the pedagogue, influencing both the content and the methods of realization of her approach. In Italy, for example, Montessori has become a national symbol, embodying pedagogical innovation, feminist thought, and civic engagement. In English-speaking contexts, the focus shifts toward the practical effectiveness of her method in fostering independence, creativity and critical thinking. In German-speaking countries, Montessori pedagogy is reflected upon through the lens of philosophical heritage and compared with the concepts of J.-J. Rousseau, J.H. Pestalozzi, and F. Fröbel. Recently, the French-speaking academic community has begun exploring the less known spiritual and anthropological dimensions of her thought. In Ukraine, where Montessori’s ideas were excluded from scientific and educational discourse during the soviet era, a revival has been taking place since the 1990s – as a part of a broader process of reinterpreting the national pedagogical tradition. In Asia, Montessori pedagogy is adapted to local sociocultural conditions and state reforms, particularly in China, India, Japan and South Korea. This comparative analysis reveals that the implementation of Montessori pedagogy is highly dependent on contextual factors. It raises a broader methodological question on how universalist pedagogical concepts are transformed through processes of intercultural reception.
References
Babini, V. (2000). Science, feminism and education: The early work of Maria Montessori. History Workshop Journal, 49(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/2000.49.44
Baligadoo, P. D. (2020). Learning for Peace: The Montessori Way. In W. J. Morgan, A. Guilherme (Еds.), Peace and War. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48671-6_9
Berezivska, L. (2023). Pedagogical discourse on the new Ukrainian school 1917–1921: using newly gained independence to reach out to the world’s ideas after the fall of the Russian Empire. History of Education, 52 (1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2022.2126532
Bosna, V. (2015). Maria Montessori uno sguardo diverso sull’infanzia. Foro de Educación, 13 (18), 37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.018.002
Cadei, L., & Sità, C. (2020). Maria Montessori : Penser l’éducation des jeunes enfants. Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres, (79). http://journals.openedition.org/ries/7162. https://doi.org/10.4000/ries.7162
Chen, Amber & Guo, Shu. (2024). The Spread of Montessori Education in Mainland China. Journal of Montessori Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v10i2.22573
Chistolini, S. (2020). The Turning Point of Italian Scientific Pedagogy in The School of Maria Montessori and Giuseppina Pizzigoni. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 7 (3), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v7no3a10
Durdas, A. (2023). Educational ideas of Maria Montessori on the pages of foreign periodicals. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 3 (76), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2023.3.8
Frierson, P. (2021). The Moral Philosophy of Maria Montessori. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 7 (2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2019.41
Langlois, J., & Richard, A.-S. (2021). La face cachée de Maria Montessori. LeVerbe. https://leverbe.com/articles/culture/la-face-cachee-de-maria-montessori
Lillard, A. S. (2011). Montessori: The science behind the genius (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Pavlenko, T. (2024). Postat Marii Montessori (1870–1952) u vidkrytykh dovidkovykh elektronnykh vydanniakh [The figure of Maria Montessori (1870–1952) in open-access reference electronic publications]. Scientific and Pedagogical Studies, 7 (7), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.32405/2663-5739-2023-7-167-179 [in Ukrainian]
Pironi, T., Gallerani, M. (2021). Montessori thought and work between past and present. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica – Journal of Theories and Research in Education. Special Issue. Intersections between human sciences and natural sciences in Maria Montessori’s thought and work, 16 (2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/13469
Schäfer, G. (2003). Einführung in die Pädagogik der frühen Kindheit. Beltz.
Williams M. P. Becoming an international public intellectual: Maria Montessori before the Montessori method, 1882–1912. British Journal of Educational Studies, 2022, 70 (5), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2022.2108757
Yonezu, Mika. (2018). History of the Reception of Montessori Education in Japan. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 5(2), 77-100. https://espaciotiempoyeducacion.com/ojs/index.php/ete/article/view/176
Zhebrovskyi, B. M. (2014). Naisuchasnisha klasyka [The most modern classic]. Doszkilne Vykhovannia, (8), 2–6. [in Ukrainian].
Zhu, J., & Zhang, J. (2012). Montessori education in China: Early childhood teachers’ perceptions and classroom practices. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(4), 72–79
Zhu, Jiaxiong. (2015). Early Childhood Education and Relative Policies in China. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 3, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/2288-6729-3-1-51
Copyright (c) 2025 Alla Durdas, Tetiana Havrylenko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.